Monday, April 25, 2016

Unit 3: Reflection 4/28/16

Unit 3 Reflection
            In this third and finally unit I really gained a more full and in-depth insight into my topic as well as the inquiry of the entire class. At the beginning of this class I thought what “Technology and Identity” really meant. As I brainstormed I kept coming back to the issue of how individuals in college are always looking on their phone and their laptops whilst in class. So this spurred me into doing a lot of research in this area. I began to find studies that showed that more and more college students were spending more of their time on their devices. Additionally, I found that the increase in the use of mobile technologies was actually lowering the average human attention span. As I dove deeper into the concept of technology and its effects on the human attention span I started to wonder about what other negative impacts could technology be having on society. That’s when I started to peace together that socially humans were becoming less and less physical in their interaction. This had not been clear to me the entire first Unit as well as most of the second. However whilst writing my Unit 2 research paper a decided that it was necessary to add in.
            In the first Unit I really had no idea what my target audience was going to be. However, when I arrive on the audience of college students during Unit 2, it really helped me to focus in on what I really want to be saying that will directly relate to college students. I decided to turn my argument into something more of a critique of the modern college student as well as how technology has affected them. Being a college student really helped me when crafting my project because I knew what facts and points would resonate with my audience. I was able to add in different aspects to my project that I knew would be digestible as well as informative to my target audience.
            When it came to deciding which medium to present my research to my target audience through I decided to use Microsoft PowerPoint. Yes, it might not have been the most creative and outgoing medium to choose, but I knew that if one can make a PowerPoint correctly it is the best, or one of the best ways to effectively present information to an audience.  Additionally, college students are accustomed to viewing PowerPoint slides in their daily lectures. So they are accustomed to digesting the information in a slide format.
            When completing my Unit 1 and Unit 2 portfolios I received a lot of helpful comments and feedback that really helped me develop my ideas. One good comment that I received stated,
I liked this breakdown of technology and the way it specifically affects our generation. We were the first to really grow up with cell phones in our hands all through our middle and high school years, which definitely changed our social development. I always notice similar things when walking around campus, everyone has ear buds in and is looking down at their phone and I'm guilty of it too. I thought the initial comparison of our attention spans to a goldfish's and how much it has dropped was a very good use of an introduction because that is shocking so it makes you want to read more. I also liked your use of quotes and thought you did a good job of "unpacking" them like the rubric says to.” (Nate Moffitt comment on Unit 2 paper)
This comment isn’t necessarily feedback in the sense that it was stating areas in my paper in which I should change. However, this comment really came at a time when I was unsure of what idea to do. This comment reassured me that the topic I was heading towards was something that was applicable to college students and society as a whole. Another helpful comment that I received stated:
“I really like this introduction, but I think that I'm missing the link between your pitch and the intro of your paper. Make sure to include the difference between the "writing a note" and being on your phone, from the pitch. Also make sure to avoid comma splices. Your source seems really interesting so far, and I'm excited to see where you are going to go with the rest of this paper: maybe having that "roadmap" somewhere in the intro of your paper would help to see where the reader is going to be taken with your ideas.” (A Wilson comment on Unit 2 rough draft)
This comment really help tie all my facts and ideas together into one full project that flowed nice and smooth through one idea to the next. Additionally, this person helped me a lot with my grammatical and spelling errors within my research paper.
Lastly this comment was given by the same person as the previous one (A Wilson) in response to my Unit 2 pitch. It stated,
Make sure to spell-check again. You can also delete "however" from the 5th sentence. Add commas to make sentences more clear, again in the 5th sentence. You need a qualification for "Technology has shortened the average attention span of teens and young adults". You need a "so" in this sentence, because it could be more effective if you had a reason why this was important to your overall paper, as well as in the pitch as a whole. You can link this sentence to the second to last sentence with a comma to give it that "so". You also don't need the semicolon. Generally, I really like your ideas for this paper. – AW
Other than attending to my grammatical errors in my pitch this comment really helped my address what I was writing about. Previously I was only really writing about how technology was lowering the attention span of humans. But after the comment I turned my writing into more of how that change in attention was affecting society. This was the “so” that I was addressing in my paper. This comment really helped me steer my project into what it is now.
            As previously stated I translated my Unit 2 research paper into an informative PowerPoint presentation to be presented along with my narration to my target audience. When opening my presentation, I gave a fact that opened many people’s eyes due to its absurdity. The fact that opens my presentation is one that will draw my audience in and it is that “The human attention span has actually decreased over the years and is now lower than a goldfish’s attention span.” (Unit 3 presentation) Now that I was able to capture my audience I can really address the real problem, which is how technology is shortening the human attention span and changing the social dynamic of this modern society. I was able to convert many of the facts that I had drawn from my research into info graphics which I used to visually represent my argument. I felt that by doing this it would be a more effective way of showing my target audience verses telling them.
            The reason for me doing this presentation and choosing this topic is because I would hope that after viewing my presentation and reading my Unit 2 paper my target audience would understand what technology is doing to society and maybe attempt to use their phones less. In this project I am not trying to argue that technology is bad for society, because it definitely is. I just want them to understand that using certain types of technology such as phones and laptops excessively is actually affecting them in ways they may not expect. I hope that after viewing my project individuals will go out and explore the world and meet people verses keep their attention, and in a way their life, in the virtual world of the internet. The world is a beautiful place filled with many interesting people, why not go and see what it is all about?

            

Unit 3: Final Presentation 4/28/16


This is the link to the audio I could not figure out how to get it on the video. Start them both roughly at the same time.
https://soundcloud.com/nathan-hines-10/presentation

Thursday, April 14, 2016

Unit 3: Graphic Novel Post 4/14/16

This book is subtitled "The Theology in Peanuts," and is made up around 125 of cartoons taken from "Peanuts" strips spanning the twenty-five years from 1958 to 1983. Philosophically and theologically, they give the reader a lot to think about, as well as being flavored with Schultz's brand of humor. The book is arguing how Schultz was able to weave threads of Christianity throughout the entire Peanuts comics during his career. It gives numerous examples showing subtle instances of maybe a bible verse or just a Christian custom. Even though this cartoon strip is meant for the purpose of humor and pleasure Schultz cleverly peppers in some religious and philosophical messages that can only be understood on a deeper more intellectual level. This book is breaking down the carton and showing how Schulz uses the Peanuts characters to illustrate Christian theology. I enjoyed reading this book because I was a huge fan of the Peanuts comic strips as a child. However, this book opened my eyes to a side of the Peanuts that I honestly never even thought about. As I read the popular strips like Christmas and Halloween and was opened to a new side of the stories that I had previously never noticed.

Thursday, April 7, 2016

Unit 3: Documentary Review 4/7/16


I chose to analyze a Hollywood Reporter review of “On the way to School”. After reading this review I have found a few aspects of the review that generally are aspects of the genre. To begin, a review should give an honest summary of the movie to include either direct quote or paraphrases of certain scene. This helps to give the reader a general idea of what the movie is about without completely ruining the movie. Additionally, a review should give an over arching theme of the production. In this review of “On the Way to School” the author states “We often forget how lucky we are to go to school” this is an example of the main idea of this documentary film. Furthermore, a film review should address the audience that the movie is geared towards. For example in the “On the Way to School” documentary the author states that the documentary can “be marketed to parents and students alike”. This is good because it lets the reader know if it is appropriate to watch if there are children. Lastly,  I feel a review should have a little bit of the authors opinion. I’m not say to be noticeably biased but just to hear the authors personal voice and giving his/hers opinion in the review.


Mintzer, Jordan. "On the Way to School (Sur Le Chemin De L'ecole): Film Review." The Hollywood Reporter. N.p., 1 Oct. 2013. Web. 07 Apr. 2016.